分级方案

文理学院的所有课程都使用一个通用的评分方案,将加权百分比转换为相应的字母成绩:

信等级 加权比例
A 93–100%
A- 90–92.9%
B+ 87–89.9%
B 83–86.9%
B- 80–82.9%
C+ 77–79.9%
C 73–76.9%
C- 70–72.9%
D 60–69.9%
F 低于60%

根据正规澳门赌场网络本科学术目录,字母成绩将转换为相应的平均绩点质量点

信等级 平均绩点
A 4
A- 3.75
B+ 3.5
B 3
B- 2.75
C+ 2.5
C 2
C- 1.75
D 1
F 0

学术诚信

Procedure for Reporting and Review of Alleged Academic Misconduct in the 文理学院

正规澳门赌场网络文理学院(CAS)将学术诚信视为教育体验的基石. 下面描述了报告的过程, 回顾, 处理中国科学院学术不端嫌疑案件, 的行为准则 正规澳门赌场网络学生手册(PDF)

A course 教练 who believes a student has engaged in academic misconduct will:

  • 通知(通过电子邮件)并与学生会面,讨论学术不端行为的怀疑以及下一步的步骤.1
    • If, 在这次会议之后, 不当行为不再被怀疑, 老师会将结果通过电子邮件发送给学生, with a copy to the Academic Director (AD) and CAS Associate Dean (CASAD). 没有采取进一步的行动.
    • If, 在这次会议之后, 不当行为仍有嫌疑, 老师会用电子邮件发送学生的名字和事件的简要总结(包括是否未成年人的评估)2 或者主修专业3 (违反)他们的AD, CASAD,4 复印一份给学生.

然后,CASAD将:

  • Determine if this is the student’s first or a subsequent infraction.
  • 通过审查提交的信息并根据需要咨询指导老师和/或副主任,核实事件的范围(次要/重大).
  • Reply to the 教练, AD, and student with the identified pathway and to confirm next steps.
    • If the suspected misconduct is minor and it is the student’s first infraction, the procedure will follow the Educational Pathway (A) outlined below.
    • If the suspected misconduct is major and/or it is the student’s second or subsequent infraction, the procedure will follow the Sanctionable Pathway (B) outlined below.

(A)教育途径

When a suspected case of academic misconduct is determined to be appropriate for the Educational Pathway, CASAD应:

  • 与指导老师和AD合作,收集任何额外需要的信息,包括支持文档.
  • 审查提交的文档.
  • 和学生见面讨论这件事.

If, 在与CASAD的会议期间, 学生们说他们是诚实的, the case will transition to the Sanctionable Pathway (B) for evaluation. 如果学生承认有不当行为,CASAD将:

  • Report the outcome to the 教练 and AD; the 教练 will determine the academic outcome5 然后把这个告诉学生.
  • 确定适当的教育机会和/或恢复性司法途径,并与学生沟通.
  • 跟进导师和相关单位,确保学生在约定的截止日期前完成学业要求和教育/恢复性司法途径。.
    • If the student completes all required components with integrity, the name is kept on file with the CAS Dean’s Office but not sent to the Office of Student Resolutions (OSR). 老师会收到一封电子邮件, AD, and student to confirm completion of the Educational Pathway requirements. Any subsequent incidents of suspected academic misconduct will proceed through the Sanctionable Pathway.
    • 如果学生没有完成所有要求的部分(教育/恢复性司法实践和任何额外的学术工作), 学生的名字被提及到OSR(与可制裁途径的结果相同),并且不给予学术工作学分(强制执行学术处罚)。. 老师会收到一封电子邮件, AD, and student to confirm this outcome.

(B)可制裁途径

When a suspected case of academic misconduct is determined to be appropriate for the Sanctionable Pathway, 署长须:

  • Review a written account of the incident (provided by the 教练), 包括所有相关文件. 指导老师可能会建议适当的处罚(最低的处罚是不及格)。.
  • 要求与学生会面讨论费用,并为学生提供五个工作日的回复时间. If the student does not reply to the AD’s request for a meeting or attend the meeting within 10 business days, 那么AD将在没有学生输入的情况下继续进行

After 回顾 the documentation and meeting with the student, the AD will send the following items to the CASAD within five business days of meeting with the student:

  • 所有相关文件.
  • A description of their decision on the veracity of the charge.
  • 必要时,提出适当制裁的建议.

If the AD has concluded the student has maintained academic integrity, the AD will:

  • Communicate with the 教练 to determine an appropriate course of action.
  • 信息rm the student, 教练, and the CASAD of their decision.

If the AD concludes that academic misconduct has occurred, the CASAD will:

  • Review the relevant documentation, the AD’s conclusion, and the recommended sanction. 
  • 如果这是学生第一次通过制裁途径评估的违规行为,则对指控和制裁做出最终决定.
  • 如果AD和CASAD对结论和/或建议的制裁存在分歧,与AD沟通,以确定适当的行动方案. 
  • 通知AD(通过电子邮件), 教练, 学生决议办公室主任, 以及学生的最终决定和处分, 如果合适的话, within five business days of receiving the material from the AD.

If the alleged infraction is the second or subsequent incident evaluated by the Sanctionable Pathway, CASAD审查案件,然后将其(和所有相关材料)提交给学生决议办公室主任,通过学生决议审查程序进行评估,该程序概述在新威尔士大学学生手册中.

脚注

1 Meetings should be held in person whenever possible; however, 在必要情况下, 一个视频会议, 电话, 或者电子邮件也可以作为替代品.

2 轻微的违规行为可能是对什么构成学术不端行为的误解和/或没有预谋. 轻微违规行为包括但不限于未经授权与同学合作完成家庭作业, 实验报告, etc; minor plagiarism (e.g., 不完整的引用, 不恰当的释义和/或引用, or a brief passage used verbatim without proper attribution) and/or minor self-plagiarism; use of unauthorized resources on an assignment, 家庭作业, 报告, 文章, or other similar work; multiple submissions of the same paper or 报告 for assignments in more than one course without permission of each Instructor (includes different classes and course repeats); possession of an unauthorized resource during a quiz or exam but without direct evidence that it was used to aid the student.

3 Major infractions are more significant acts of academic misconduct, 可能是有预谋的和/或涉及多个学生, 并且直接违反了学生行为准则. Major infractions could include but are not limited to falsification or fabrication of data, 报告, or sources; cheating, 复制, or using unauthorized resources on an exam or quiz; major plagiarism (e.g., absence of citations, entire passages, or multiple phrases plagiarized); egregious cheating (e.g., hiring someone to do the work or use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools or platforms to do the work when expressly prohibited); falsification or fabrication of data, 报告, or sources; unauthorized use of a faculty member’s instructional material (e.g., posting to an online site); actions that alter or destroy the work of another student; the acquisition and/or use of another student’s work without that student’s express permission; repeated minor infractions

其他因素(e).g., 学生在学校的一年, volume or significance of infractions in a given incident) may influence the determination of minor vs. 重大违规. 在学术不端行为评估过程中, a student’s case may change from a minor infraction to a major infraction and vice-versa. 正规澳门赌场网络学生手册包含了学术不端行为的更多细节和例子.  院长将对未成年人vs .未成年人做出最终决定. 重大违规.

4 如果课程讲师也是学术主任, the Associate Dean will designate an alternate to serve in this role. 如果CASAD是课程讲师, another Dean in the 文理学院 will review the case at that level.

5 遵循教育途径的学生可能有机会通过修改和重新提交工作(如适用)来减少学术制裁, 如果修改和重新提交是不可能的, other options may be offered at the discretion of the Instructor.

If the student fails to complete a “redo” assignment or alternate work by the specified date, 他们将在该作业中获得零分,他们的名字将被提及OSR(可制裁途径的净结果)。.

If the student’s re-submission also involves a suspicion of academic misconduct, a new case is opened and evaluated by the Sanctionable Pathway.

Procedure for grade appeals in the 文理学院

符合大学政策,学生1 希望发起成绩申诉必须联系他们的课程导师的问题或担心他们的最终成绩. 学生 are advised to familiarize themselves with the course syllabus prior to initiating an appeal. 

如果问题没有与课程讲师解决, the student should then contact the Academic Director of the school from which the course is offered.2 学术主任(或指定的)将与课程讲师协商,并根据需要应用任何特定的课程/项目级别政策,以对成绩上诉作出决定.

如果这件事没有在学校层面得到解决, the student may bring their concern to the CAS Dean’s Office (cas迪安@yscfrp.com). The CAS associate 迪安 for Student Academic Affairs will consult with the course 教练, 学术主任, 迪安, 和其他需要的校园单位, 并根据可获得的信息和公布的大学学术政策做出决定.

脚注

1 根据大学政策,学生必须在获得成绩后的两个学期内提出成绩申诉.

2 When the course 教练 is the Academic Director of the school in which the course is housed, 如果与课程讲师无法解决问题,学生可以直接向中国科学院院长办公室提出问题.